Are examinations a fair way of testing our knowledge – debatewise ways to make small money

Class discussions and debates are, with active class participation, one of the most effective ways of learning and retaining ways to make small money information. Through being forced to better one’s own views and opinions, theories and answers, the student gains a deeper insight into their own arguments, becomes better at discussing their views, and the class benefits from listening to these views and ways to make small money thinking about how the views of their peers compare to ways to make small money those of their own. Through this they can alter their own opinions or form ways to make small money new ones. Class participation is a necessary requirement seeing as how even ways to make small money if one person refuses to engage in the discussion, their own ideas are never put to the test of ways to make small money both the peers and their teacher, and so receive no benefit for their own beliefs, and the class also receives no benefit from that particular ways to make small money student. And this is just one student! Full class participation is an absolute requirement.

How do we accurately test students? We test them through what they are best at and ways to make small money what they are happiest with through immediate student and teacher ways to make small money feedback during and after classes. Weekly or monthly the parents/guardians of those students will receive report cards, showing which subjects their son/daughter is best at, and which they need the most help with. It will also be noted which classes are that child’s favourite. Parents and students must also be able to suggest ways ways to make small money in which their classes could be made better, so long as the suggestions are realistic, reasonable and that they contribute to the learning environment in ways to make small money such a way that the students learn more and at ways to make small money no cost to student/teacher and student/student relationships. For example, bullying must not become more common as a result of ways to make small money changes to the class.

Examinations should appear annually, but no more than that. If there are discrepancies between one’s examination and one’s school work, then this must be investigated, as it would be within the current system now. However, discrepencies are far less likely within this proposed framework, as all the progress and learning goes on during school ways to make small money hours and under the supervision and encouragement of the teacher. (this does not mean to say that kids should not ways to make small money be assigned homework, but the homework itself would be judged on how well ways to make small money the student can prove that they did it i.E., through class discussions the next day).

The fact remains the truth because EXAMINATION IS NOT THE ways to make small money TRUE TEST OF KNOWLEDGE . Its every where , instances where after exams student forget most if not all ways to make small money they’ve learnt during the session all because they were reading ways to make small money only to pass the exams and nothing more . This is becoming more and more common among those who ways to make small money just want to find an easy way out to study ways to make small money where student cram solutions to past questions just to pass ways to make small money the exam…..And the exams has not help in anyway either since ways to make small money its has always been repetition of past questions or modification ways to make small money of past question. I really don’t know what to call this but in most cases ways to make small money the teacher will always want you to give them what ways to make small money they give , what am saying is that they want you to write ways to make small money it the way they taught you in the class, you know, I really don’t know what this thing called examination is ? . I will give you an instance , back then when I was in school ,….We had the subject in physics which was very wide ways to make small money and we did a lot of examples and class work ways to make small money , due to the complexity of the course we had to ways to make small money read both text books and all necessary materials we could ways to make small money lay our hands on ….During the exams the questions where just examples we did ways to make small money in the class , and you wont believe it many student failed . What am I saying ….This thing called examination which test how best you can ways to make small money cram and how lucky you could be ? ….What I mean by that is , there are instances where you will go to an exams ways to make small money and your area of concentration will not even be part ways to make small money of the exams ,…not that you don’t know it or you’ve not read but the aspect of the course where ways to make small money you are good is not on the exams …..So you see there are a lot to this examination ways to make small money of a thing….I think there should be a better way of testing ways to make small money students knowledge about what they’ve learned and how deep they understand it …..And not just making them cram past questions and answers..

“I’ve been making a list of the things they don’t teach you at school. They don’t teach you how to love somebody. They don’t teach you how to be famous. They don’t teach you how to be rich or how to ways to make small money be poor. They don’t teach you how to walk away from someone you ways to make small money don’t love any longer. They don’t teach you how to know what’s going on in someone else’s mind. They don’t teach you what to say to someone who’s dying. They don’t teach you anything worth knowing.” – neil gaiman

Given all that you’ve said the absence of exams/tests would ipso facto, be an even worse assessment of knowledge, potential and/or ability. Since there is no alternative measure that if it were ways to make small money given the importance given to formal testing would/does not fail in all the areas that exams have ways to make small money failed. It is important to know how people perform under pressure ways to make small money since work (and everything else that exams prepare and assess you for) is generally thought to be very stressing. It’s not just that we have to give exams so ways to make small money that we can pass, but with exams we revise what we read and when ways to make small money we learn all these things they settle in our mind.

I have never been comfortable with a very good grade ways to make small money (an A) or a very bad grade (an F) I may have received as a result of taking a ways to make small money test. Grades on either extreme often leave me wondering if I’ve learned anything at all. One thing I have learned recently, as a result of failing miserably on a test, is that the test itself can be flawed. A little research reveals that the skills required to develop ways to make small money a fair, meaningful and comprehensive test, regardless of the subject matter, are considerable. Imagine for example, a mid-term exam, in this case applied mathematics, with an extremely narrow subject bandwidth, as compared with the overall course material, and limited to essentially three questions, two of which are worth 40 points each with the ways to make small money third worth 20 points. None were multiple choice or matching type questions. Miss just one of the 40 point questions and you ways to make small money get an F! To receive an A required a correct answer on 100% of the material! What does a test like this say, to me or the instructor, about what I’ve really learned in this class? Not much!

Likes try to take a case in point, of mathematics class which one student takes online versus another ways to make small money who takes in class. Now the student in class may actually be a harder ways to make small money worker, smarter, an overall better student but he is challenged to the ways to make small money fact, that he must take the same exam as the online ways to make small money student, who is able to use his notes, book, online resources. So does the exam treat the student’s fairly? Lets look at another fact of exams, in a generalization most classes consists of 3-4 exams, each exam covering 2-3 chapters, then a compressive final covering all chapters and of course ways to make small money homework. Most classes go by weighted scores, such that your exams consists of 50% of grade, your final 30% of grade, and your homework 20%. Student’s put emphasis on these weighted scores, by creating priorities such that, homework is considered the bottom of the food chain. Why work on homework, when the tests are more important? When the scary realization is that homework is the tool, that provides the best way to create lasting knowledge. How do you get better at a math theory? You constantly use that math theory on dozens of problems ways to make small money over and over again, such as you would find on homework. However on the flip-side on a test, you memorize a theory, use it once, and forget about it. So exams fails to create lasting knowledge, which is the whole point of classes. My final point, doesn’t necessarily point the flaw in examination but the flaw ways to make small money in the examineer. We’ve all had times, where a teacher would vaguely touch on subject, yet the subject becomes a big part of the test. Some teachers fail to recognize the flaws in their teaching ways to make small money method, as most teaching methods consists of trying to create ever ways to make small money lasting knowledge which takes a long time, and repetition. When tests mock the fact of this by exploiting student’s who are good at the skill of learn and ways to make small money forget, studying whats going to be on the test, rather than knowledge provided by the teacher, which sometimes isn’t even on the exam. To finish, I’d like to suggest alternatives tests that would better replace ways to make small money traditional exams. The best I feel would be oral exams, a one on one talk with the examiner as he ways to make small money goes through different questions, would eliminate exams problems that have weird worded question or ways to make small money ask vague questions, and then the examiner could full evaluate the person knowledge ways to make small money and ability use set knowledge in "test" sort of situation. Take home tests, are another, but cheating is an increased chance, so an implement of different tests would have to be ways to make small money used. The student benefits from this, for being forced to research again the knowledge that he ways to make small money or she has probably lost over the course. Which I think should be the true reason for a ways to make small money final test, a refresher on what you’ve learned. Also the final suggestion would be to lose the weighted ways to make small money score of tests, maybe making homework 50% of grade, 3-4 tests 7-10%, and the final test 20%, that way it gets rid of the one thought knowledge ways to make small money test. Because even a student who is copying answers, as long as he copies the method, he is learning something, such the same as a kid who copies theories from ways to make small money a book. Writing or retyping is effective way to create knowledge.

RELATED POSTS