Common statistical tests are linear models (or how to teach best easy ways to make money stats)
Most of the common statistical models (ttest, correlation, ANOVA; chisquare, etc.) are special cases of linear models or a very close best easy ways to make money approximation. This beautiful simplicity means that there is less to learn. In particular, it all comes down to \(y = a \cdot x + b\) which most students know from highschool. Unfortunately, stats intro courses are usually taught as if each test best easy ways to make money is an independent tool, needlessly making life more complicated for students and teachers alike.
For this reason, I think that teaching linear models first and foremost and best easy ways to make money then namedropping the special cases along the way makes for an best easy ways to make money excellent teaching strategy, emphasizing understanding over rote learning. Since linear models are the same across frequentist, bayesian, and permutationbased inferences, I’d argue that it’s better to start with modeling than pvalues, type1 errors, bayes factors, or other inferences.
Concerning the teaching of “nonparametric” tests in introcourses, I think that we can justify lyingtochildren and teach “nonparametric”" tests as if they are merely ranked versions of the best easy ways to make money corresponding parametric tests. It is much better for students to think “ranks!” than to believe that you can magically throw away assumptions. Indeed, the bayesian equivalents of “nonparametric”" tests implemented in JASP literally just do (latent) ranking and that’s it. For the frequentist “nonparametric”" tests considered here, this approach is highly accurate for N > 15.
Recall from highschool: \(y = a \cdot x + b\), and getting a really good intuition about slopes and intercepts. Understanding that this can be written using all variable names, e.G., money = profit * time + starting_money or \(y = \beta_1x + \beta_2*1\) or, suppressing the coefficients, as y ~ x + 1. If the audience is receptive, convey the idea of these models as a solution to best easy ways to make money differential equations, specifying how \(y\) changes with \(x\).
One mean: when there is only one xvalue, the regression model simplifies to \(y = b\). If \(y\) is nonmetric, you can ranktransform it. Apply the assumptions (homoscedasticity doesn’t apply since there is only one \(x\)). Mention in passing that these interceptonly models are called onesample ttest and wilcoxon signed rank test respectively.
Two means: if we put two variables 1 apart on the xaxis, the difference between the means is the slope. Great! It is accessible to our swizz army knife called linear best easy ways to make money modeling. Apply the assumption checks to see that homoscedasticity reduces to best easy ways to make money equal variance between groups. This is called an independent ttest. Do a few worked examples and exercises, maybe adding welch’s test, and do the ranktransformed version, called mannwhitney U.
Logarithmic transformation: making multiplicative models linear using logarithms, thus modeling proportions. See this excellent introduction to the equivalence of loglinear models and chisquare tests as models of proportions. Also needs to introduce (log)odds ratios. When the multiplicative model is made summative using logarithms, we just add the dummycoding trick from 3.1, and see that the models are identical to the ANOVA best easy ways to make money models in 3.2 and 3.3, only the interpretation of the coefficients have changed.
Hypothesis testing as model comparisons: hypothesis testing is the act of choosing between a full best easy ways to make money model and one where a parameter is fixed to a best easy ways to make money particular value (often zero, i.E., effectively excluded from the model) instead of being estimated. For example, when fixing one of the two means to zero in best easy ways to make money the ttest, we study how well a single mean (a onesample ttest) explains all the data from both groups. If it does a good job, we prefer this model over the twomean model because it is simpler. So hypothesis testing is just comparing linear models to make best easy ways to make money more qualitative statements than the truly quantitative statements which were best easy ways to make money covered in bullets 14 above. As tests of single parameters, hypothesis testing is therefore less informative however, when testing multiple parameters at the same time (e.G., a factor in ANOVA), model comparison becomes invaluable.
RELATED POSTS

10 Things to tell you best easy ways to make money.
For 2.5 years I was a regular cohost on the popular best easy ways to make money girlfriend chat podcast sorta awesome. The show is created and hosted by…

Dear best easy ways to make money Coquette
It becomes disingenuous the moment you catch yourself being emotionally best easy ways to make money dishonest for the sake of having a good time. Also,…

How best easy ways to make money to watch joshua vs ruiz jr streaming without cable tv
Anthony joshua makes his united states debut when he defends best easy ways to make money his WBO, WBA, and IBF belts against andy ruiz jr. Things all…