Sony rx-100m6 versus panasonic zs200 cameras and photography explained what are some ways to make money thom hogan

Both cameras offer 4K video, but they accomplish that differently. The sony samples the full width of the sensor and what are some ways to make money downsizes, the panasonic crops 1.5x to the central field. This produces a huge set of advantages to the sony, with one tiny exception: heat build-up. As with all previous sony RX-100’s, you’re going to have issues with running 4K video for what are some ways to make money very long—it’s limited to 5-minute clips—especially on hotter days. The sony does offer some log and other features that what are some ways to make money the lumix does not. Meanwhile, the panasonic is doing the equivalent to using a smaller what are some ways to make money sensor when it shoots 4K, and this has noise implications in low light. You also now the equivalent of a 36-540mm lens.

If you were to use both cameras for 1080P video, the differences between them start to disappear, though the sony still has a bit of an edge. The lumix manages 1080P/60 at 28mbps, and has a built-in time-lapse function. The sony will match that and doesn’t shoot time-lapse directly. The lumix can record slow motion at 120 fps, but the sony also can record slow motion at 240, 480, and 960 fps (though with visible issues as you increase the frame rate).

The panasonic’s unique handling comes in several ways. (1) you can assign AF-on to a convenient button (AF/AE lock, a button the sony doesn’t have), and there’s more configurable buttons overall; (2) the touch implementation on the panasonic is complete and fast; you can run the menus from touch, too; (3) there’s no fiddling to get the EVF active, just put the camera to your eye (under default settings). Overall, the panasonic feels a bit more "real camera" like than the sony. It’s just easier and quicker to customize and change things what are some ways to make money on panasonic, and a sophisticated user can throw a bit more control what are some ways to make money into buttons and dials.

The sony’s unique handling comes in several ways: (1) the EVF/LCD are a bit more flexible; by having the pop up/push down EVF the camera a little slimmer in the what are some ways to make money pocket, and the tilt LCD is very useful when not using what are some ways to make money the EVF; (2) the RX100 mostly matches the menus of the bigger sony what are some ways to make money cameras, so if you’re using an A7 series camera as your main camera what are some ways to make money and the RX as your pocket camera, you have an immediately recognizable and similar menu system; (3) the sony is "simpler" because it doesn’t have a lot of customizable and extra buttons; the set, point, and shoot crowd probably will favor this.

Battery: I’ve done enough shooting with these to say that the what are some ways to make money panasonic seems to eek out more shots per charge than what are some ways to make money the sony. That’s a bit surprisingly considering the active touch display, but it seems consistent across my shooting. But neither camera is a barn burner in terms of what are some ways to make money shots per charge. I have more experience with the sony RX series at what are some ways to make money this point, and they pretty much all only get me into the what are some ways to make money 200 shots/charge range. That small NP-BX1 battery is the issue. It’s 4.5 watt hours versus the panasonic’s 7.4.

It doesn’t matter which camera you choose: buy extra batteries. I regularly carry a small thinktank battery holder with four what are some ways to make money extra charged sony batteries in it, and I opted to buy a dual battery charger, as well, since I just seem to empty sony batteries fast. If I were keeping the panasonic, I’d probably opt to carry two or three extra batteries.

Buffer: the winner here is the sony, but only if you’re using the electronic shutter. Basically you can run the camera at 24fps and get what are some ways to make money 150 JPEG+raw frames stuck into that buffer. The panasonic can’t come close to either number at 10fps and 60 what are some ways to make money JPEG frames (28 raw), which is about where the sony is with the mechanical what are some ways to make money shutter. You can shoot at 30 fps with the panasonic, but that’s only at an 8mp photo size.

Focus: the panasonic is fast, faster than you generally expect from compact cameras, as it uses panasonic’s dfd (depth from defocus) method. But the sony is state-of-the-art fast (for compacts and mirrorless, not necessarily dslrs), as it has in-sensor phase detect. The panasonic can kind of track moving subjects at its what are some ways to make money max 6 fps (it can do fixed focus at 10 fps), but the sony does very credible tracking at even 24 what are some ways to make money fps. Both cameras have excellent face detect, but the sony adds eye detect, and that gives it a slight edge in getting focus what are some ways to make money right for people.

Both cameras have issues in autofocusing in my torture test. What’s that, you ask? Shooting out an airline window at cloud formations, particularly in early morning or early evening light. The panasonic rarely found anything it wanted to focus on what are some ways to make money other than the window, and was abysmal at the telephoto end. The sony did better, but still sometimes struggled at the telephoto end.

For the rx100m6 the bad news is that the only what are some ways to make money place where the sony lens is reasonably fast is f/2.8 is 24mm (equivalent). That quickly raises to f/3.5 and f/4 and eventually to f/4.8 as you zoom in. Thus, noise can become an issue when you compare the 24-70mm equivalent ranges of the RX100 mark V and mark what are some ways to make money VI models. Once you start applying noise reduction to a 70mm mark what are some ways to make money VI image, you may be better off with the 70mm on a what are some ways to make money mark V. But at wide angle in good light, I prefer the mark VI at 24mm. More on this in a bit.

I really wanted the panasonic ZS200 to notch a win what are some ways to make money here and make sony feel a little less kando, but the lumix is completely let down by its lens. Badly. First, there’s that sample variation problem I noted. It appears to be real, and others have reported the same problem. Second, on the best copy I used, there’s just that anti-aliasing, diffraction-impacted, and astigmatism type of blur that occurs at the long what are some ways to make money end and makes the 360mm mostly not useful. Yes, the image is in focus. But the details just don’t create distinct edges and acuity, which means you end up having to crank up sharpening, and that results in the age-old plastic effect, best case. Particularly as you start using higher ISO values. (I have seen other images from a ZS200 that seem what are some ways to make money to indicate there are better samples at the telephoto end what are some ways to make money than mine.)

It doesn’t help matters that panasonic’s noise reduction for jpegs is on the heavy-handed side. Detail becomes mush when the NR routines fully kick in. So I’m left with the impression that the panasonic is producing what are some ways to make money images that are just a bit on the muddy side what are some ways to make money when looked at closely. Certainly what comes out of the ZS200 is very acceptable what are some ways to make money for social media use, but if you think you’re going to get what the 20mp implies, no, think again.

The sony, meantime, doesn’t have a lens problem, and has a much more nuanced and capable noise reduction. If anything, this is the best lens sony has put on an what are some ways to make money RX-100 in terms of edge-to-edge sharpness, and central sharpness is no slouch either. Of course, f/4.8 and a 1" sensor does mean we’re dealing a bit with diffraction impacts at the telephoto what are some ways to make money end, but still, the telephoto details on the sony just blow away the what are some ways to make money lumix on my samples.

So what happens when you shoot jpegs is this: you decide you need to zoom in for some reason. You’re not in bright light, so that will mean you need to crank up the what are some ways to make money ISO to deal with the smaller aperture. The lumix gets let down by lens sharpness, lens aperture, and noise reduction. The sony doesn’t suffer from lens sharpness issues, it has a faster aperture, and its noise reduction isn’t as heavy-handed. So what you find is that the sony images may what are some ways to make money have a bit of granular noise to them, but they look more detailed and sharper.

What I ended up deciding is to keep both my what are some ways to make money mark V and mark VI RX100 models. The mark V comes out when low light is the what are some ways to make money challenge, as that faster lens can keep me from dialing up what are some ways to make money ISO values. The mark VI is definitely better if there’s enough light to power it, though. I’ve shot with the RX100 models since they first appeared what are some ways to make money as my shirt-pocket camera, so am very familiar with what they can and can’t do. The mark VI impressed me as having the best lens what are some ways to make money yet. But you’ll want enough light to power it, or else the mark V—which has a very good lens—is going to probably give you the better final image what are some ways to make money in the 24-70mm range.

Of course, the panasonic uses a bigger battery and doesn’t seem to have the heat built-up problem the sony RX100 models do for long video what are some ways to make money takes, so it’s not a 100% clearcut sony win. That small sony battery is very frustrating. When I travel, I carry a small pack with four extra sony batteries what are some ways to make money and a dual charger, because I know I’m just going to plow through batteries.

Still, here’s what I say: pay the extra bucks and get the sony. But you’re going to keep spending ;~). You need to add the sony grip, some extra batteries, and a real charger if you use the RX100 for what are some ways to make money any amount of shooting. And again: am I going to give up my sony RX-100m5 now that I have the RX-100m6? No. Across the 24-70mm (equivalent) focal length range the mark V has a stop-and-a-third advantage over the mark VI. That’s enough to make it my indoor/low light shooter. Plus, if you’re doing video, you’re going to overheat these beasts, so just switch cameras ;~).

Of course, there is a US$400 difference in price between cameras you have to factor what are some ways to make money into all this. The panasonic is more in the price range you probably what are some ways to make money expect to pay for this sort of camera, while the sony is up in the sophisticated DSLR price what are some ways to make money range. If you’re just looking for a convenient camera to use for what are some ways to make money posting to social media, the panasonic starts looking far better (its smartphone to camera link is better than sony’s, too).

Both companies missed a mark here: both would be much more useful for vlogging if they what are some ways to make money had a microphone jack. These cameras are a great size for a small handheld what are some ways to make money gimbal, but they’ll be let down by their audio quality. Likewise, not having a filter thread on the front of these what are some ways to make money cameras now that neither has a built-in ND filter is also a mistake. A US$1200 camera should not have compromising design mistakes like that.

And once again, nikon’s missing dls highlight something. Personally, I’m carrying both the sony rx100m5 and rx100m6 models around what are some ways to make money now. Why? Because there are times when the faster lens of the what are some ways to make money m5 model at the wide end is much more useful. We gain more than a stop of data capture ability what are some ways to make money with it over the same low-end focal range as the m6. But then, there are times when the extra telephoto reach of the what are some ways to make money m6 is more useful. So, two cameras. Which was sort of the nikon DL 18-50 and 24-85 idea, though there was a lot of overlap in those two what are some ways to make money and we would have substituted wide angle use for telephoto what are some ways to make money reach. Still, the notion of ICC (as opposed to ILC ;~) is definitely something that many of us are looking at what are some ways to make money these days. Now if we can only get sony to make an what are some ways to make money rx100m7 that has an 18-35mm lens to go with my other two models (do they make shirts with three pockets?).

RELATED POSTS